So I just went to see the Da Vinci Code today. My motivation was threefold. First, it was $2 at the second-run theatre. I am cheap for the very good reason that I am broke.
Second, I didn't want to waste my time reading the book. I'd glanced over the first few pages and, like
Left Behind, seemed to have all the linguistic complexity and character development of See Spot Run. See, I'm not against Christian fiction per se, just the 80% of all fiction that is complete trash.
Third, I was eager to defy the "boycott" of the film by the Christian community. My motivation for this, in turn, was also threefold (I AM a Trinitarian, afterall). First, 0n principle, I disagree with anything that is propagated by mass email forwardings (except anti-government conspiracy theories. And, on principle, I believe in all of them). Second, I am naturally defiant. Third, and seriously, I think the big stink that Catholics (and evangelicals) have raised has given Dan Brown too much credibility. It gives the impression that there is something to his arguments (if you want to call them that). There isn't.
So, yes, it is as stupid as everyone said it was. The dumbest theory, and really the one on which the whole movie hinged, was that a triangle is the ancient symbol for "male" and the inverted triangle that for "female." Thus, pentagrams, pyramids, and triangular spaces in paintings represent the Holy Grail, who is actually Mary Magdalen, the wife of Jesus. That's logic.
The appeal of the movie is the same as the appeal of UFOs--the spooky music, dark figures, indecipherable symbols appeal to our desire for the Numinous (I assume most of you know what C.S. Lewis had to say on the subject). Many of the scenes took place in Churches. Yet although he played on the Mystery of religion, Brown ultimately tried, in a preachy yet subjective way, to discount the supernatural in the end. You can't have it both ways, Mr. Brown.